Even though I have yet to read
the Mahabharata fully, the stories and characters of the epic have always
impressed me and influenced me. Of course, I have read a number of discourses
on Mahabharata, starting from Kuttikalude
Mahabharatham(Children’s Mahabharatha) and many books written on various
characters of Mahabharatha in Malayalam or translations into Malayalam from
other languages like Hindi, Marathi etc.A chapter, which was part of SSLC
Malayalam syllabus from a book(Bharataparyatanam) written by the great critique from Kerala,, Mr.Kuttikrishna
Marar was the starting point. The moment I had some money saved from my monthly
hostel allowance, I procured the book and must have read the content at least
10 times. I have always been impressed by the intellect, determination , love
and care of Devabratha (who later came
to be known as Bhishma for the sapath or pratigya
he took for taking care of the interests of his father),by the heroic deeds of
Arjuna & Karna, the friendship of Duryodhana, the dharma way of
Yudhishtira, and of course the naughty but all encompassing and dispassionate view of Krishna……..The list is endless. And what
impressed me more that each of these characters represented many aspects of the
good or the bad, the right or the wrong
or some kind of traits that exist in human beings.
Many might have thought that these were stories of
the long-gone era, but as a discernible observer of organizations, you may find
that many of these characters are alive and kicking. And in today’s
ultra-competitive environment that exist between corporations or other
organizations or between people of the same organization, you may find the
existence of the full-blown modern versions of them.
If you observe your organization,
you may find a number of these characters existing in your organization. You
may find a Sakuni, in you midst, who
tries to instigate many around them with their at times even innocent-looking
comments or remarks. Anything happening around them , they try to interpret in
their own negative ways and even advise some others with how to interpret them. Organizations
have their own Duryodhanas, who fall prey to such interpretations or advices. For
example, the Sakunis may spend a lot of time
analyzing mails send by others and attribute meanings which the sender might not
have even imagined to exist. They influence the receivers of the mails with the
unfortunate connotations leading to a spat or at least a misunderstanding
between two friends. Even though Duryodhanas
are more straightforward and dharma-oriented(according to me more so than the
Dharmaputra / Yudhishtira), they are highly influenced by the likes of Sakuni
who knows where and how to tickle
their weak spots).
Of course, the organizations have
their own Bhishmas, who puts forth their verdicts as the final word on dharma. Taking
the email simile, the organizational Bhishma may even put strictures on whether
such mails be sent or who to mark copies.
The organization also may have
Viduras, who takes a dispassionate view of everything and just serves the King
as they are duty-bound; they may do so
even when they know for sure that the King is not necessarily doing the right
thing.
Disclaimer: If anybody in any organization identify him/herself with any of the characters mentioned above, it is only accidental, even though it might validate my analogy.
Disclaimer: If anybody in any organization identify him/herself with any of the characters mentioned above, it is only accidental, even though it might validate my analogy.
No comments:
Post a Comment